From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76814-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11339 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2010 21:16:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 11330 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2010 21:16:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:16:37 +0000
Received: from kpbe14.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe14.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.78])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oB6LGZ9q021668	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:16:35 -0800
Received: from qyk10 (qyk10.prod.google.com [10.241.83.138])	by kpbe14.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oB6LGIsJ025380	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:16:34 -0800
Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so3918204qyk.1        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.91.13 with SMTP id k13mr4845021qcm.299.1291670194211; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.203.201 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83pqte38nq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20101129003949.502FC246199@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<m3sjyjstdg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTimXeqzeVP-R0RZPehORxmdS3=_3vkfHh2A7AfP7@mail.gmail.com>	<83tyiz8o0h.fsf@gnu.org>	<AANLkTinUAteSaa2fRXoy5Ocjr51Mr8nLCWLQH-CSssDC@mail.gmail.com>	<E1PNOFq-0005NJ-MM@fencepost.gnu.org>	<AANLkTinDY=OdC8C9dMtFF911J2=31kkWe-TmUC8FVZoy@mail.gmail.com>	<m3vd3eprhc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTimc4=zCqUnOWi5HOmN=9HmLbai2P7QNkQW_-3AX@mail.gmail.com>	<83sjya39sn.fsf@gnu.org>	<AANLkTikT2_EpGkhd2sVZmcuRmXv4iDShkJSUaHG7A1PT@mail.gmail.com>	<83pqte38nq.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTikx2S59t79=JwksEKfhvdofX6SQmPinfpOBo5O-@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] Don't install gdb.PYTHONDIR if -nx
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:58:27 -0800
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> This is mostly just for testing, so I punted.
>
> If it's only for testing, do we need to document it in the manual? =A0Or
> maybe just say "for testing GDB using its test suite", and be done.

Well, there's a difference b/w "mostly" and "only". :-)

But I think a ref to node Data Files should be sufficient.
Whaddayathink?