From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73268-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26675 invoked by alias); 24 May 2010 23:07:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 26660 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2010 23:07:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:40 +0000
Received: from hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.7])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o4ON7bHv003486	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:38 -0700
Received: from pwj2 (pwj2.prod.google.com [10.241.219.66])	by hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o4ON7Zjl022924	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:36 -0700
Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so2289769pwj.26        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.55.4 with SMTP id d4mr4559543rva.243.1274742455309; Mon, 	24 May 2010 16:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.255.14 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3ljb8sz4e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <20100522165438.5D5A48439A@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<m339xjyg37.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTinSbLNGmUMB01LFofTVz-p5nuka5k9rfCcExLkH@mail.gmail.com>	<m3zkzptir1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTinDHIBJwwQWtWNi4jPbaFipK18jN9H5sm1kdPgs@mail.gmail.com>	<m3ljb8sz4e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 03:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTikfSzJolyl6lYyCjPWb_ddFs5oga4Hf3CNzplgM@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] new python features: gdb.GdbError, gdb.string_to_argv
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" =3D=3D Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> OTOOH there's commands that use parse_to_comma. =A0If gdb needs to
> Doug> provide that (if only implemented as a wrapper around some
> Doug> python-provided module, users should only ever have to import a
> Doug> function and invoke it), then I think it should provide both
> Doug> parse_to_comma and libiberty's buildargv.
>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Why doesn't your implementation actually use gdb_buildargv?

Dunno.
I'll check in the patch revised to use gdb_buildargv.