From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21586 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2010 02:30:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 21576 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2010 02:30:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:30:03 +0000 Received: from wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.88]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o9L2U0pg024992 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:30:00 -0700 Received: from vws5 (vws5.prod.google.com [10.241.21.133]) by wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o9L2Twts022492 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:29:59 -0700 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so2607946vws.36 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.182.13 with SMTP id ca13mr62458vcb.2.1287628198472; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.118.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CBFA227.8050501@codesourcery.com> References: <4CBEDBF5.9060504@codesourcery.com> <201010210114.24465.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4CBF86A6.8020102@codesourcery.com> <201010210128.53843.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4CBFA227.8050501@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fix Makefile.in in data-directory From: Doug Evans To: Jie Zhang Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Jie Zhang wrote: > I don't think it's really necessary to fix that. binutils and gcc also don't > allow "make -j4 install" to directly after "configure". "make -j4 all > install" also fails for binutils and gcc. I think it's already an convention > that those software are built with > > ./configure > make > make install > > Do we really need the effort to fix GDB? fwiw, I think the answer is yes. Note that we don't need to consider ./configure ; make -j4 install. The issue arises with a simple "$EDITOR foo.c ; make -j4 install".