From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22280 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2011 23:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 22272 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2011 23:50:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:50:52 +0000 Received: from hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.12]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p1NNonIf026772 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:49 -0800 Received: from vws8 (vws8.prod.google.com [10.241.21.136]) by hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p1NNnU7u027426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:48 -0800 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so2465528vws.40 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.167.42 with SMTP id zl10mr152525vdb.254.1298505047800; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.43.145 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:50:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r5azs8me.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110218235945.997602461AA@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <83zkpstoxn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5azs8me.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch, doc RFA]: New python function lookup_global_symbol From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:50:10 -0800 >> From: Doug Evans >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> Thanks. >> Here is what I checked in. > > One comment about your commit: > >> +is a field of a method's object (e.g., @code{this} in @code{C++}), > > We use "C@t{++}" in the manual for the C++ language. =A0Putting it all > in @code is not right, because it isn't a program symbol, and it also > looks weird in the Info output, where @code is converted to `..' > quoted string. Ah, right. Sorry 'bout that. Fixed. I grepped for C++ trying to find the right way to write `C++', but of course such a grep fails to find C@t{++}. I wonder how useful it would be to have a section at the top of the file containing various formatting hints.