Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: time to start thinking about GDB 7.3 (as well!)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=87YghaxDxUR21LPq62HXkWTRJ6Ek9M9v-D4St@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110214145010.GX2384@adacore.com>

7.2.1

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:50, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> According to the tentative calendar, it's also time to start thinking
> about the GDB 7.3 release process.  Normally, we were planning on
> branching next week.
>
> Judging from the entries in the NEWS file, I think we have enough
> material to make a new release.  However, I also believe that the
> same issues that we identified as a blocker for 7.2.1 are also
> relevant for 7.3.
>
> There is a Wiki page for the 7.3 release:
>    http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.3_Release
>
> Can we start putting entries for things we know need to be fixed
> before branching/release?
>
> We should also discuss features that we think would be worthwhile
> waiting for. Some Python work being finished, for instance, which
> might nicely complements some of the new enhancements we got?
> Tracepoints? gdbserver work? Etc.


I am woking on the tracepoint printf support.  Wish it can be in 7.3.


>
> What I propose is to produce 7.2.1 as soon as the blocking issues
> are fixed.  We might also be creating the 7.3 branch pretty much
> at the same time, which means that 7.3 might be coming shortly
> after 7.2.1, but I think that's OK. I'd rather not have a 7.2.1
> if that means artificially delaying 7.3 - but I don't a problem
> with producing both.
>

Wish we can get 7.2.1 early.  :)

Thanks,
Hui


      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-15  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-14 14:52 Joel Brobecker
2011-02-14 19:33 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-14 20:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-07 11:27   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-07 11:43     ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-07 12:35       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-03-07 15:44         ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-15  4:06 ` Hui Zhu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTi=87YghaxDxUR21LPq62HXkWTRJ6Ek9M9v-D4St@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox