From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31801 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2010 19:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 31778 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2010 19:43:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:42:54 +0000 Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so634264wwj.12 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:42:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.205 with SMTP id d13mr3896350wbw.159.1290282171672; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.149.229 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:42:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101120193829.GC24876@gmx.de> References: <20101023095951.GN2183@gmx.de> <20101027182939.GI15343@gmx.de> <20101102200841.GG4123@gmx.de> <20101117190145.GE12746@gmx.de> <20101120193829.GC24876@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make install-strip with binutils From: NightStrike To: Ralf Wildenhues , Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, NightStrike Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ralf Wildenhues w= rote: > * Gerald Pfeifer wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:24:13AM CET: >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > Now, as GCC build maintainer, it seems most of this patch is free to >> > proceed on (still, I'd welcome any review!), and the src bits are >> > trivial. =A0The web update has been OKed off-list by Gerald, so the on= ly >> > remaining bits are in gcc/doc/install.texi. =A0Is that part of the bui= ld >> > maintainer role too, or OK to go ahead with? >> >> I can approve that one, too. :-) >> >> There is one thing there that may confuse our users a bit and that is >> the following: > > Fixed according to your suggestion. =A0Thanks for the review! This applies to anything in top level configure, right? So we can install-strip GCC, binutils, gdb, etc?