From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10128 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 12:13:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10104 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 12:12:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mga11.intel.com (HELO mga11.intel.com) (192.55.52.93) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:12:46 +0000 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 04:12:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 04:12:44 -0800 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.244]) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.19]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:11:26 +0000 From: "Metzger, Markus T" To: Jan Kratochvil CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" Subject: RE: [patch v9 06/23] btrace, doc: document remote serial protocol Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1362416770-19750-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1362416770-19750-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130305200809.GF2386@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130306095024.GA8387@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130306120737.GA28588@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20130306120737.GA28588@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Kratochvil [mailto:jan.kratochvil@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:08 PM > As long as each commit is buildable and not regressing (and not introduci= ng > unapproved code/functionality which just gets deleted by a later patch) i= t is > preferred to check it in separately. I squashed the gdbserver/remote changes and I'll also squash the record refactoring. Regarding PRs, is it OK to log a PR for the recursive function known fail b= efore the series has actually been committed? Regards, Markus. Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052