From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mL7oFunUxmPC0RgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:03:37 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5258C1E128; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:03:37 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=nC2BcA8P; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4991E0D3 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:03:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FC43858421 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8FC43858421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1673975015; bh=QiAxw3RC/H5vJgJEdEcYbPv1EM6W6tMT0l+DZ9xbZ+M=; h=To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=nC2BcA8PVEhqRdl9hPKr0vzzN8iqhT1pNXjwUas++v7CyjQAqo+PZ47RYcxa0AtvB PfklBStEzhq1RCBGTw3XFLctHMqLF53SjBLUupjoznw/rPUG+4JwurOxtTxZ0l28Fg QZm3MEz6758yncwArbArUBaJKtoC0LYtQj5slEd8= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294903858C52 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 294903858C52 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30HGOD34022045; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:05 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n5y5trwps-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:05 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 30HGTmwr008996; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:04 GMT Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n5y5trwpm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:04 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30HEtApF005665; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:04 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.130.99]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n3m17en1v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:04 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.230]) by smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30HH32dq32113258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:03 GMT Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18A45805A; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2252658066; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.12.142]) by smtpav03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:03:02 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <9fe94c0979cb40979b0dea7693a901c2d9f66164.camel@us.ibm.com> To: Tom de Vries , Bruno Larsen , Ulrich Weigand , "will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: cel@us.ibm.com Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:03:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <65d44121-65f7-a212-79ec-07ce53c15ecb@suse.de> References: <50474aa92ba82eff05cdc8f49001eae56be29670.camel@us.ibm.com> <89331c26795e3f7743e1e068dce43b3c2dd53008.camel@us.ibm.com> <071f24ecf9b3a2bbbe8fee7db77492eb55c5f3ff.camel@us.ibm.com> <1d9b21914354bef6a290ac30673741e722e11757.camel@de.ibm.com> <3e3c9c40f07ab01c79fe10915e76ffa187c42ad9.camel@us.ibm.com> <122f5d2d3db9ef1979b0f8da927d005f32bba82c.camel@us.ibm.com> <011768e8-2b76-f8ed-1174-fbaa020b15e7@redhat.com> <78b464a1-e32e-c3da-85e4-7bfc322cc29f@redhat.com> <7848e9858b54e33e399b871774ffc0b5058c1736.camel@us.ibm.com> <65d44121-65f7-a212-79ec-07ce53c15ecb@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: vLPzbvVQunvvKZsykueEv0gUAVtauEy2 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PPt_6thgrdU5b_vLuiwZC2sfWdIZv8F6 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2 version 2] fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.923,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-17_08,2023-01-17_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=604 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301170133 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Carl Love Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Tom: On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:55 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > AFAICT, this has been committed just now. > > I'm having difficulty finding an approval, did it happen maybe > offlist? > > Thanks, > - Tom I just committed it based on Bruno's reply. > The patch has been tested on X86 and PowerPC with no regressions. I will reiterate that I don't know much about PPC, so the best I can do is check for style and tests, but apart from a few minor nits inlined, it looks ok Tested-By: Bruno Larsen I thought that was an approval to commit. Is it not? Carl