From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62933 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2016 17:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 62918 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2016 17:04:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=gcc-help X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:04:21 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1btdzv-0006nh-K6 from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:04:19 -0700 Received: from [172.30.8.195] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:04:16 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixup gdb.python/py-value.exp for bare-metal aarch64-elf References: <1475771231-1739-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com> <33a4a07e-7d59-bdb8-a87b-9f6aea6e76d2@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Reply-To: Luis Machado From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <9ec466f7-ad95-18e6-c963-83c35399c7f5@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.201) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 Hi Yao, Given Martin's reply, do you think this is now acceptable with possibly some minor fixups? Luis On 10/07/2016 11:59 AM, Luis Machado wrote: > On 10/07/2016 11:51 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> Well, I am not a C standard guru, so I can be wrong. I post >> this question to gcc-help >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2016-10/msg00031.html >> > > That is ok. Let's see what comes out of that. > > Thanks, > Luis >