From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 116575 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2016 16:25:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 116546 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2016 16:25:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:24:59 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 33) id 9EC811E809; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:24:57 -0500 (EST) To: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] Further cleanup/modernization of gdb.base/commands.exp X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:25:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <835da2d0-1d1a-907d-420e-5332f3336a9b@redhat.com> References: <1478650771-24430-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1478650771-24430-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <994221f0964b21175ece863b9e4eed59@polymtl.ca> <1e856161-24c0-5f93-7847-a2bf9af57e8c@redhat.com> <937642fa3965d4029b5c98cb84a26954@polymtl.ca> <835da2d0-1d1a-907d-420e-5332f3336a9b@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9d7681f17b6ab79976fdc9e3ae18632c@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 On 2016-11-09 11:16, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 11/09/2016 04:09 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> On 2016-11-09 10:59, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> And I'm wondering whether this below as well would be a good idea, >>> or whether it'd obfuscate? If a good idea, maybe we'd put the new >>> variable in gdb.exp. >> >> ... >> >>> @@ -45,7 +50,7 @@ proc_with_prefix gdbvar_simple_if_test {} { >>> "else" \ >>> " p/x 0xdeadbeef" \ >>> "end"] \ >>> - "\\\$\[0-9\]* = 0xdeadbeef" \ >>> + "$valnum_re = 0xdeadbeef" \ >>> "#1" >> >> >> That's not bad. I was going to suggest using {} instead of "" to get >> rid of most backslashes (untested): >> >> -"\\\$\[0-9\]* = 0xdeadbeef" >> +{\$[0-9]* = 0xdeadbeef} >> >> but with the variable it looks good as well. >> > > Here's the resulting squashed patch then. WDYT? LGTM.