From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id CJCuKQHl5mhaoyQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:26:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1759962369; bh=d8mJOoV3NxKe1F/c+WP5YGIyS4f7r50Y7RHVvgTYDbs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=VpvxAVrFJHwRVFOS6BKg8oIbQdsmWggAOfSoEMs9VngTBR9t5VErumxgE+l6LJ2PO 4GSyx8Q1ln3LjkwFVJPxVUKuqxkJc8o0pNLxswu8SzVmEBUTMSWbZ4DoZKsmvq1Wav PRItMjJSCSippMmdNj+ngJbxa2s3cOLK/Qn6GsWE= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9D1241E0AD; Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:26:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=KIWSknhW; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404241E0AD for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:26:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91D33858C41 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:26:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D91D33858C41 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=KIWSknhW Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF563858D1E; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:24:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0FF563858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0FF563858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759962291; cv=none; b=ABIbWw8C3YiUNIyYArOACWsYjZ4uUN6S/YLcCaBWWTCFXIg2CwEiALienOFoSUi1dprHBqASPrSc1knK5sf6MssAJFgWYFVgwKGpxed48TlRzSLN9OLC6LxxknHB4C2TlF7B4vyEQIPV2HAHPCWsJ58ZQcmxurv6fOjDH/MJbVA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759962291; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d8mJOoV3NxKe1F/c+WP5YGIyS4f7r50Y7RHVvgTYDbs=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=lYsJ0bssmpVaIRAQkQ5TSmdJIRR1XDxiozOMH6EyAKT3euVkj/fqNI7+SemQoTELb4z49c/EVoKAyXYKXiiSni7Y9niYSnvhT8Caj/VlP1dGQROne6DXFF+nDPJX5iSiIySkROdVUtv41sAMprYujtqk9BxocKlLYanWrirXvMo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FF563858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1759962290; bh=d8mJOoV3NxKe1F/c+WP5YGIyS4f7r50Y7RHVvgTYDbs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=KIWSknhWfXEfle+XxJF2BmmKJiMylr/T6SZ9uMgQ9KzaBfZUEEDE+1XyOBJwu3rAv cycQU/XE0Md6Q2zE8VqC6bSb7rbiV4KqhGcoeyl7ney9/AIFUJt++dLbsP/RfsnZpV ScesEE4rN2b77jLic9isE+fI97dxDe5ldt50jAGQ= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 8560E1E0AD; Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:24:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9bad032c-1066-4b12-b3bd-4d1deb841355@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:24:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add .clang-format To: Tom Tromey , Andrew Pinski Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, GCC Mailing List , binutils References: <20251006183901.1239002-1-tom@tromey.com> <87frbv3jmg.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <87frbv3jmg.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 10/6/25 3:39 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski writes: > > Andrew> We had a small discussion about this at the cauldron and I think it > Andrew> was agreed that we should include the same across at least GCC, > Andrew> gdb/binutils too. > > IIRC gdb and gcc don't really agree on formatting. Someone who knows > the gcc style well would have to go through all the settings to see. I've said earlier regarding sharing the .clang-format with binutils: I personally care very little about the actual formatting, I care that it can be automated. So if the gcc folks feel strongly about some aspect of the formatting, there is a 99.99% chance that I will be perfectly fine with that choice. Simon