From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63379 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2018 13:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 63365 invoked by uid 89); 31 Oct 2018 13:52:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=ton, phil X-HELO: mail-wm1-f66.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f66.google.com) (209.85.128.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:52:16 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id w7-v6so4173143wmc.1 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:ae6a:ed00:4685:ff:fe66:9f4? ([2a02:c7f:ae6a:ed00:4685:ff:fe66:9f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1-v6sm23154557wme.23.2018.10.31.06.52.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 06:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: Run test when software watchpoints are used To: Andrew Burgess , Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180704164017.5849-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20180706135950.GM2675@embecosm.com> <25d43a27477e9ac14c7a0a4dad19d580@simark.ca> <20180706232109.GR2675@embecosm.com> <20180710140104.GF3978@embecosm.com> From: Phil Muldoon Message-ID: <9b83ed42-81ab-49b2-4d86-e8d87692e2d6@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:52:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180710140104.GF3978@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00748.txt.bz2 On 10/07/2018 15:01, Andrew Burgess wrote: > * Simon Marchi [2018-07-06 20:47:16 -0400]: >> Yes, that looks good. However, the test doesn't really work for me here, >> even without this patch, I get a ton of failures. Does it work well for you >> on native x86_64? If so, I'm fine if you push the patch. Finding it why it >> fails on my machine is another story. Here's the gdb.log, for reference. >> >> https://pastebin.com/raw/izy5c0Eh I've tracked this bug, with what I know, in: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23845 Cheers, Phil