From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gdb/dwarf: when in dwarf2_cu, read addr_size from dwarf2_cu::header
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:46:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b4f8ff9-d86c-4910-9e0b-acc485102bed@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jyzmt7rl.fsf@redhat.com>
On 2025-11-19 09:30, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:
>
>> This patch fixes a crash caused by GDB trying to read from a section not
>> read in. The bug happens in those specific circumstances:
>>
>> - reading a type unit from .dwo
>> - that type unit has a stub in the main file
>> - there is a GDB index (.gdb_index) present
>>
>> This crash is the cause of the following test failure:
>>
>> $ Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp ...
>> ERROR: GDB process no longer exists
>
> It's probably worth mentioning that this failure only occurs when using
> the cc-with-gdb-index board.
Fixed.
> I would encourage you to consider extending the existing test to cover
> this case without needing to test with the cc-with-gdb-index board. I
> think the reality is most people don't test every patch with every
> board. But I do understand that, if taken to extreme, that would mean
> running every test in every mode, which clearly doesn't scale. But when
> we run into a regression my instinct is to ensure that the default test
> mode covers this case. And there's plenty of precedent for this in the
> testsuite, e.g. gdb.server/*.exp. You're welcome to take the test
> changes from the patch linked above if that is useful.
Good idea, I'll check that.
> Also in the patch linked above is the addition of an assert:
>
> gdb_assert (this->section ()->readin);
>
> in 'dwarf2_per_cu::get_header ()'. I haven't checked the later patches
> from this series yet, so maybe you already do something similar, but if
> not, maybe it would be good to add something like that in this patch,
> given that this is dealing with the assert caused by the section not
> being read in?
Haven't checked the review comments on that patch yet, but the following
patch removes dwarf2_per_cu::get_header.
Thanks,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 21:10 [PATCH 0/6] Type unit + split DWARF fixes (PR 33307) Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: use single abbrev table in .dwo files Simon Marchi
2025-11-10 20:14 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-18 13:32 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-18 16:50 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-18 16:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-18 17:20 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 16:05 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:21 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: convert _section proc to use parse_options Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 10:59 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 15:53 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:40 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: emit type unit sections as COMDAT Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 11:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] gdb/dwarf: when in dwarf2_cu, read addr_size from dwarf2_cu::header Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:30 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 20:46 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2025-11-19 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:51 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] gdb/dwarf: store addr/offset/ref_addr sizes in dwarf2_per_cu Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 16:14 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-21 19:54 ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-21 21:25 ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] gdb/dwarf: use dwarf2_per_cu::ref_addr_size in one spot Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:44 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b4f8ff9-d86c-4910-9e0b-acc485102bed@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox