Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gdb/dwarf: when in dwarf2_cu, read addr_size from dwarf2_cu::header
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:46:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b4f8ff9-d86c-4910-9e0b-acc485102bed@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jyzmt7rl.fsf@redhat.com>



On 2025-11-19 09:30, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:
> 
>> This patch fixes a crash caused by GDB trying to read from a section not
>> read in.  The bug happens in those specific circumstances:
>>
>>  - reading a type unit from .dwo
>>  - that type unit has a stub in the main file
>>  - there is a GDB index (.gdb_index) present
>>
>> This crash is the cause of the following test failure:
>>
>>     $ Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp ...
>>     ERROR: GDB process no longer exists
> 
> It's probably worth mentioning that this failure only occurs when using
> the cc-with-gdb-index board.

Fixed.

> I would encourage you to consider extending the existing test to cover
> this case without needing to test with the cc-with-gdb-index board.  I
> think the reality is most people don't test every patch with every
> board.  But I do understand that, if taken to extreme, that would mean
> running every test in every mode, which clearly doesn't scale.  But when
> we run into a regression my instinct is to ensure that the default test
> mode covers this case.  And there's plenty of precedent for this in the
> testsuite, e.g. gdb.server/*.exp.  You're welcome to take the test
> changes from the patch linked above if that is useful.

Good idea, I'll check that.

> Also in the patch linked above is the addition of an assert:
> 
>   gdb_assert (this->section ()->readin);
> 
> in 'dwarf2_per_cu::get_header ()'.  I haven't checked the later patches
> from this series yet, so maybe you already do something similar, but if
> not, maybe it would be good to add something like that in this patch,
> given that this is dealing with the assert caused by the section not
> being read in?

Haven't checked the review comments on that patch yet, but the following
patch removes dwarf2_per_cu::get_header.

Thanks,

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 21:10 [PATCH 0/6] Type unit + split DWARF fixes (PR 33307) Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: use single abbrev table in .dwo files Simon Marchi
2025-11-10 20:14   ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-18 13:32     ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-18 16:50       ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-18 16:55   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-18 17:20     ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 16:05       ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:21         ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: convert _section proc to use parse_options Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 10:59   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 15:53   ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:40     ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 21:03       ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] gdb/testsuite/dwarf: emit type unit sections as COMDAT Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 11:43   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] gdb/dwarf: when in dwarf2_cu, read addr_size from dwarf2_cu::header Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:30   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 20:46     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2025-11-19 16:11   ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-19 20:51     ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] gdb/dwarf: store addr/offset/ref_addr sizes in dwarf2_per_cu Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:42   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-19 16:14   ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-21 19:54     ` Simon Marchi
2025-11-21 21:25       ` Tom Tromey
2025-11-07 21:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] gdb/dwarf: use dwarf2_per_cu::ref_addr_size in one spot Simon Marchi
2025-11-19 14:44   ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b4f8ff9-d86c-4910-9e0b-acc485102bed@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox