[ENOPATCH]

On 21-06-19 18:50, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 21-06-19 18:32, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 6/21/19 4:54 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> On 21-06-19 17:47, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/19 4:27 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> When building gdb using a combined gcc/binutils-gdb build and running
>>>>> gdb.base/index-cache.exp we get:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> FAIL: gdb.base/index-cache.exp: test_cache_enabled_miss: at least one file was created
>>>>> FAIL: gdb.base/index-cache.exp: test_cache_enabled_miss: couldn't get executable build id
>>>>> FAIL: gdb.base/index-cache.exp: test_cache_enabled_hit: check index-cache stats
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> With "set debug index-cache on" we get:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> (gdb) file index-cache
>>>>> Reading symbols from index-cache...
>>>>> index cache: objfile index-cache has no build id
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that the vanilla toolchain does not add a build-id, which is
>>>>> required for the index-cache functionality.
>>>>
>>>> What is "vanilla" here?  A non-combined gcc/build-gdb build?
>>>> Or is "combined gcc/build-gdb build" irrelevant here, and
>>>> "vanilla" means "no-distro-patches build"?
>>>
>>> The latter.
>>
>> OK.  Please tweak the commit log in that direction then.
>>
>> The fix LGTM too.
> 
> Thanks for the review, I've updated the rationale.
> 
> I'll commit in a bit unless there are further comments.
>