From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QSKtNZYuemQg9RsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:01:58 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C77A11E11E; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=sPwnD2EC; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692E91E0D4 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE39C385802F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:01:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE39C385802F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1685728916; bh=lMO18fJWQHBi5TK23A8OfqcWKcZjPUyhV91ZKSlpPiU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=sPwnD2ECimb7O5uT6z0YlFR1wK18JGJXBreyVM1CVJg5jsRjf6uUFrkkueKZ3KaNP YTsNuHUAkXWVtHmvQHLrO0FNyyOr5arIxIINAauhXK7owqIwkxTZs5T5IIcGBMu3ft ERdann1ibZ23EEiB9e2ZhkodoaebYrYiKk4N+Eco= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A8C3858D3C for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:01:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B6A8C3858D3C Received: from [132.207.241.186] (Sansfil-Invites-241-186.polymtl.ca [132.207.241.186]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FC8B1E0D4; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:01:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9ae8d6c1-d5b6-ba58-5489-0a721807899d@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:01:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [RFC] Bump minimum Python version to 3.4 To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: legouguec@adacore.com References: <20230602163303.3945535-1-tromey@adacore.com> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: <20230602163303.3945535-1-tromey@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 6/2/23 12:33, Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches wrote: > While looking into the f-string issue, I noticed that the README > documents 3.2 as the minimum Python version, while gdb.texinfo says > 3.0.2. Asking on irc, I found out that SuSE's "LTS" ships 3.4, and > RHEL 7 ships 3.6. Based on this I think it's reasonable to bump the > minimum required version to 3.4. This is fine with me, but for reference here's the previous attempt at doing this: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20220107152921.2858909-3-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca/#r Simon