Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Lionel Flandrin <lionel@svkt.org>,
	       Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Check for truncated registers in process_g_packet
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 21:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99a028d3486fedc258429c8c22e4777c@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-PM=2E-RHJeqDX=GVibaZP8s5mPmViFjOZnGCfqZ138JFQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2017-08-25 12:53, Yao Qi wrote:
> This patch 9dc193c causes a regression,
> 
> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-extended-gdbserver
> multi-arch-exec.exp"
> FAIL: gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp: continue across exec that changes
> architecture
> 
> This test passes on the previous commit.  The test
> passes also if I revert this commit on mainline.

 From what I can see, the line that causes the problem is

   stop_pc = regcache_read_pc (get_thread_regcache (ecs->ptid));

at infrun.c:5321.  At this point, the process we are debugging has 
exec'ed.  It used to be a 64-bits process, it is now a 32-bits process.  
However, current_inferior_->gdbarch still points to the 64-bits gdbarch. 
  It's only the follow_exec call a few lines below that will update it to 
the new gdbarch.  By reading the PC, we send a g packet.  The response 
contains the registers of a 32-bits process, but we interpret them as 
those of a 64-bits process (because get_remote_arch_state uses 
current_inferior_->gdbarch).

If I move the line mentioned above just after the follow_exec call, gdb 
interprets the g reply with the right/new gdbarch, so the test case 
works.  I don't know if it breaks anything else, but so far I didn't 
find anything before that point that relied on stop_pc.  I sent that 
change to the buildbot to check.

So from what I understand, it looks like a pre-existing bug that this 
patch uncovered.  I think we were interpreting the g reply containing 
32-bits registers using the 64-bits register map all along, which that 
stop_pc had a bogus value.

To confirm this, I checked out the commit just prior this patch.  I see 
stop_pc having a value of 0 (it could be anything I guess).  If I move 
the assignment of stop_pc just after follow_exec, I see a value of 
0xf7fd9a20.  That value is the mapping address of the dynamic loader in 
the process:

   f7fd9000-f7ffb000 r-xp 00000000 fc:01 395792                           
   /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so

plus the entry point in it:

   Entry point address:               0xa20

so it makes sense that the process is stopped at this address.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 11:10 Lionel Flandrin
2016-10-18 15:50 ` Simon Marchi
2016-10-18 16:07   ` Lionel Flandrin
2016-10-27 15:23     ` Lionel Flandrin
2016-11-08 10:37     ` Pedro Alves
2017-08-25 10:53       ` Yao Qi
2017-08-25 21:05         ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-08-25 22:55           ` Simon Marchi
2017-08-27 10:16             ` [PATCH 0/4] Try to fix the gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp failure Simon Marchi
2017-08-27 10:16               ` [PATCH 3/4] Add thread after updating gdbarch when exec'ing Simon Marchi
2017-09-05 10:37                 ` Yao Qi
2017-09-05 15:30                   ` Simon Marchi
2017-09-05 15:44                     ` Simon Marchi
2017-08-27 10:16               ` [PATCH 2/4] Read stop_pc after updating the " Simon Marchi
2017-09-05 10:12                 ` Yao Qi
2017-08-27 10:16               ` [PATCH 4/4] Test different follow-exec-mode settings in gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp Simon Marchi
2017-09-05 10:40                 ` Yao Qi
2017-09-05 15:40                   ` Simon Marchi
2017-08-27 10:16               ` [PATCH 1/4] Improve "'g' reply is is to long" error message Simon Marchi
2017-09-05  9:49                 ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99a028d3486fedc258429c8c22e4777c@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lionel@svkt.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox