From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103724 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2019 13:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 103715 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2019 13:47:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Spam-Relays-External:209.85.128.66, HX-Languages-Length:407, H*RU:209.85.128.66 X-HELO: mail-wm1-f66.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f66.google.com) (209.85.128.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:47:53 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id s15so10022462wmj.3 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s63sm28698486wme.17.2019.07.20.06.47.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gdb: Improve output from "info types" commad To: Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <51913d3e-79a3-83a2-9e66-c4f62dd9feab@redhat.com> <20190719194331.GB23204@embecosm.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <9953a60e-1ea5-ae11-e158-7f63d707a136@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 13:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190719194331.GB23204@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2 On 7/19/19 8:43 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > I've removed the gdb.cp/info-types.{cc,exp} files, and extended the > gdb.base test to include an example of 'class'. Yes, we know > internally they are handled just like structs, but I'd like to cover > it "just in case". The gdb.base case is now compiled as C and C++. > LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves