From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1826 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2009 16:22:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1803 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2009 16:22:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (HELO web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.26.118) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:22:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 14931 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jun 2009 16:22:28 -0000 Message-ID: <994867.12738.qm@web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Received: from [123.237.136.28] by web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:22:27 PDT Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:22:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch To: Hui Zhu Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00644.txt.bz2 Gentle reminder for the reply for following mail. --- On Mon, 6/15/09, paawan oza wrote: > From: paawan oza > Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch > To: "Hui Zhu" > Cc: "Mark Kettenis" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:34 PM > Hi Hui, >=20 > I have already clarified the things. >=20 > 1 -> all floating point registers (such as FTAG, FCTRL, > FSTATUS) are required to record because of insn such as > (FFREE) > 2 -> gdb already has a support of all the FPU registers > including FTAG, FSTATUS, FCTRL etc... >=20 > more importantly, patch works and properly tested with with > all possible scenerios. > I am eagerly waiting for the patch's acceptance by gdb > community : ) >=20 > please do the needful, If you have any specific sugestion > please elaborate and I will definately improve upon it. > please respond. >=20 > Regards, > Oza. >=20 >=20 >=20 > > --- On Fri, 6/12/09, Hui Zhu > > wrote: > >=20 > > > From: Hui Zhu > > > Subject: Re: Submition of > > i386.record.floating.point.patch > > > To: "paawan oza" > > > Cc: "Mark Kettenis" , > > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:49 AM > > > Even if you think i386 need this > > > register, it should not be the part > > > of process record patch. > > > You can send a patch to make i386 support this > > register > > > first. > > >=20 > > > Hui > > >=20 > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > yes. I know. > > > > I clarified that i386 also need FTAG, > FSTATUS, > > FCTRL, > > > registers... > > > > I am also waiting for the clarification > from > > Mark. > > > > Regards, > > > > Oza. > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> From: Hui Zhu > > > >> Subject: Re: Submition of > > > i386.record.floating.point.patch > > > >> To: "paawan oza" > > > >> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" , > > > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > >> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM > > > >> I had post my idea about your patch > > > >> in before. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Hui > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan > > oza > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi Hui, > > > >> > Have you/any-body reviewed > floating > > point > > > patch ? > > > >> > I am waiting for the review > comments, > > and > > > also the > > > >> clarification from Mark. > > > >> > please reply. > > > >> > Regards, > > > >> > Oza. > > > >> > > > > >> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> From: Hui Zhu > > > >> >> Subject: Re: Submition of > > > >> i386.record.floating.point.patch > > > >> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" > > > >> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > > > >> paawan1982@yahoo.com > > > >> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, > 8:28 AM > > > >> >> That is great.=A0 Thanks Mark. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Hui > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56, > Mark > > > Kettenis > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 > > 10:50:25 > > > +0800 > > > >> >> >> From: Hui Zhu > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> Could someone help us > > about > > > this? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > I should be able to, but > I'm > > > currently > > > >> travelling. > > > >> >> =A0Should be back next week. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20