From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +ND2A+fvoGJotwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 14:52:23 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0B6361E223; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:52:23 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=oN4s8hnd; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 810E71E15C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32240388B5A8 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:52:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 32240388B5A8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1654714342; bh=iioL85O2JipumpyQvmZvU1sQi4s5/D7ys1tYeXVw3Ow=; h=To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=oN4s8hndDv/117arRsMG6S7A0lddQlsImYUTfQ/5G5bVnlTsUAFuaTDCTTNIuXx0R F7Qq6dyJnU+3an17QMb8iCi/spbwGkG15eyb6iBhKZlxbIj0zad/nVmW5RjpAwUHyr 3pCDZHLN33G4vs+suiecg71K8+elcOQ8zqaP7oKw= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958B0388B58F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 958B0388B58F Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 258INdBc002626; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:48 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gk10sgg47-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 18:51:47 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 258IPZQM011633; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:47 GMT Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gk10sgg3u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 18:51:47 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 258Io9wB003744; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:46 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.19]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy19w7jq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 18:51:46 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 258IpjWU13959854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:45 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D82FBE053; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD4BBE04F; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.57.135]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <991220323670a033af39dcc64255567c216034aa.camel@us.ibm.com> To: Pedro Alves , Kevin Buettner Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 11:51:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <76bea9ad010a71ea5e2c7fd78f818bdb399810a6.camel@us.ibm.com> <20220506110826.5e16c8b6@f35-zws-1> <70a877cc-2f35-3924-6717-9d519c2730c5@palves.net> <099c8f8d8729a0051f83a034d62c18f03c789167.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <37d2a4b6a57b62662f0417f123bda6ba48066554.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <998d3f4859f16b73afd5103b682246643fef6d42.camel@us.ibm.com> <20220511154822.3b9f7d74@f35-zws-1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: OawkC4fS4O0NnEEdD9aBALNv_Y-yIRgH X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: g8cvW4Ofg7gcQwemeXz02QZMvhMjhG7p Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] PowerPC: fix for gdb.base/eh_return.exp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-08_05,2022-06-07_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=983 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206080072 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Carl Love Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Pedro: On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 19:32 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > The compiler used to build gdb does not have to be the same used to > run tests. You can build gdb with gcc as usual, and then run tests > with some other compiler, like: > > $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS="CC_FOR_TARGET=foo CXX_FOR_TARGET=foo++" > OK, I wasn't aware of that. I sent email to my contact in AIX to see if they can try that for me. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get gdb compiled on AIX so the testing of the patch was done my a person in the AIX team who is able to build gdb on AIX with gcc. Hopefully they will be able to do some more testing for me. Carl