From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71029 invoked by alias); 7 May 2018 14:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 71012 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2018 14:35:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:731, Javaid, javaid, omair X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 May 2018 14:35:27 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE369BA4B; Mon, 7 May 2018 14:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9F62024CA1; Mon, 7 May 2018 14:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2] Fix decoding of ARM VFP instructions To: Tom Tromey , Omair Javaid References: <20180421214721.7232-1-tom@tromey.com> <20180421214721.7232-2-tom@tromey.com> <87a7tf2vwf.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: GDB Patches From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <98105a00-42db-7296-534e-d7789da05590@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 14:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a7tf2vwf.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 On 05/04/2018 06:06 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Omair" == Omair Javaid writes: > >>> On 22 April 2018 at 02:47, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> -Wduplicated-cond pointed out that arm_record_vfp_data_proc_insn >>> checks "opc1 == 0x0b" twice. I filed this a while ago as >>> PR tdep/20362. >>> >>> Based on the ARM instruction manual at >>> https://www.scss.tcd.ie/~waldroj/3d1/arm_arm.pdf, I think the >>> instruction decoding in this function has two bugs. > [...] > > Omair> Seems LGTM. Let me get back to you after running testsuite for regressions. > > Did this work out? FAOD, this is OK if there are no regressions. Thanks, Pedro Alves