From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id H1G7F//NLWllaQwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:18:55 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=polymtl.ca header.i=@polymtl.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=oct2025 header.b=QO6tDHSL; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 52D181E0B6; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:18:55 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934451E08D for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:18:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1047248FD399 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:18:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1047248FD399 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=polymtl.ca header.i=@polymtl.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=oct2025 header.b=QO6tDHSL Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C89448FD877 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:16:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9C89448FD877 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=polymtl.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=polymtl.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 9C89448FD877 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=132.207.4.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1764609374; cv=none; b=Za3+oEM3B5SpmV4xNAebbsqSrHXbvwku9WWArBrRl3PG369QP83HHpMk6Djc6uGSEsL8k3n3SOohLnr2uzl32TiAeqJhfer1TSLLYiEUQbXYt3w8+ee+H6xfPKwFBqAKy/5PiGTr1c1SIsQwBn0mfQlKkb+VjeyO/K4PkXsIsdQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1764609374; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Rmh60gFoO+LG6yiVDEz1i21yXyEAznr1K7U4Tnc3TE=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=B30+IYfJ7B4a4nbfBoHwy8XJdYuL0b4hYMwAH6EixFwr4XX70ALuuaMZbRcSMXaVBsl6Mzr88MJqpPbatZcPZScqFSfnujbQ73LpMcTYtdClZQjcnqjjytQE9vMj0+2L8Dw7y71k/AxsRgsGXa6qAgWD/Z5lh8c7brjuPwISDxY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C89448FD877 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 5B1HG4eb186109 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:16:08 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 5B1HG4eb186109 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=polymtl.ca; s=oct2025; t=1764609369; bh=R1mqba5dUdp8UrLNlt3YP0xRDXoIBMlHMowOl8XKqCQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=QO6tDHSLwZkMzj/OaF6FhxiGzWH863g+lr+LTR7k3enf7yqphsMeMgXBl+6exiaNi O2qxocWwqsJN+Ke4R2545b/UvLsZQcWlp8qSuLFNWB4NyVLm32OkhaeJskd86OxXOg WNiOwsp81mUxV4/fJ2JlyLi7BmvITJn3KIGY6mhoHGtvzF+FUyC20iK3KhQGkyTK8P Szdo1WQGByaJ8CjbPrvG1kZHN+n/bvcfq0Nny2IyMdWqvJjXgIscDMSgaqIRJffpEY KXUqMiCbymOqLpSoEi5QGrpmJJKzFBb5fDnuSe3kU4SqEvvDa3SmyWwEMVLdTqZWYE rMcB/y9Bc1CEg== Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 010D31E08D; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:16:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <97d882dc-025c-4bce-90e4-8fdeb805390d@polymtl.ca> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:16:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: fix a few typos To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20251124215409.3761464-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <195c97cd-6d7d-47b2-a5b6-dc57c65e0679@suse.de> <7144681c-8584-4b84-a030-a2ad587b60d3@polymtl.ca> <7ead3569-5727-4f12-a9eb-40acf3193c3a@suse.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <7ead3569-5727-4f12-a9eb-40acf3193c3a@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:16:04 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2025-12-01 12:12, Tom de Vries wrote: > Interesting. > > I wonder if that will still work with my proposal for moving the > commit-log check from the commit-msg to the post-commit stage ( > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2025-December/223036.html > ), in which case the commit message is produced by a wrapper script, > and not by git as is the case for the commit-msg stage. Depends, what do you mean by "will still work"? > Also I wonder, don't you get warnings for removed lines in the > scenario you describe? I don't recall, but it's possible that I get them and ignore them. Simon