Re: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost)

Raoul Gough
2003-02-11T21:46:19Z

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote in message
news:20030206233654.GA12906@redhat.com...
> I don't believe that I have the right to check this in,
unfortunately.
>
> I'm just mentioning this in case someone was waiting for me to do
> something...

I should probably mention that I can't check these changes in either.
I was assuming that Elena Zannoni would be the person to do this, but
maybe I should send mail to Philippe De Muyter, who's listed as the
coff reader maintainer? AFAIK, the changes were well received on the
mailing list, so I expected someone to check them it fairly soon once
I got the assignment forms done.

Unless there's still something I have to do before the changes can be
accepted, but nobody's mentioned anything so far...

Raoul Gough.

>
> cgf
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:56:37PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote:
> >Apparently my copyright assignment forms have now been processed,
so my
> >patches for extracting minimal symbols from DLLs could now be
entered
> >into CVS. This message includes up-to-date diffs with the latest
> >versions of the relevant files, as well as some documentation that
I've
> >added to gdb.texinfo (basically, there's a new node under the
Cygwin
> >Native node entitled "Non-debug DLL symbols" which explains some of
the
> >tricks involved).

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts