Re: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost)

Elena Zannoni
2003-02-11T21:52:44Z

Sorry, I will look at it again, but I am a bit swamped until next week.
Feel free to send mail to Philippe as well, though.

elena

Raoul Gough writes:
> "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote in message
> news:20030206233654.GA12906@redhat.com...
> > I don't believe that I have the right to check this in,
> unfortunately.
> >
> > I'm just mentioning this in case someone was waiting for me to do
> > something...
>
> I should probably mention that I can't check these changes in either.
> I was assuming that Elena Zannoni would be the person to do this, but
> maybe I should send mail to Philippe De Muyter, who's listed as the
> coff reader maintainer? AFAIK, the changes were well received on the
> mailing list, so I expected someone to check them it fairly soon once
> I got the assignment forms done.
>
> Unless there's still something I have to do before the changes can be
> accepted, but nobody's mentioned anything so far...
>
> Raoul Gough.
>
> >
> > cgf
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:56:37PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote:
> > >Apparently my copyright assignment forms have now been processed,
> so my
> > >patches for extracting minimal symbols from DLLs could now be
> entered
> > >into CVS. This message includes up-to-date diffs with the latest
> > >versions of the relevant files, as well as some documentation that
> I've
> > >added to gdb.texinfo (basically, there's a new node under the
> Cygwin
> > >Native node entitled "Non-debug DLL symbols" which explains some of
> the
> > >tricks involved).
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com