From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10092 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2003 09:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10061 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2003 09:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2003 09:02:01 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (cable-129-113.inter.net.il [213.8.129.113]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id BFW35986; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 12:01:53 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 09:02:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: fedor@doc.com Message-Id: <9791-Sat07Jun2003120214+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3EE144C3.6000203@doc.com> (message from Adam Fedor on Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:49:55 -0600) Subject: Re: [Ping/RFA]: ObjC Documentation Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3EAF44EE.30301@doc.com> <3ED97889.30707@doc.com> <1190-Sun01Jun2003192231+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3EE144C3.6000203@doc.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:49:55 -0600 > From: Adam Fedor > > Thanks for the comments. Here's the final patch... Approved, but please make these minor corrections: > +@cindex Objective-C > +@value{GDBN} can be used to debug programs written in Objective-C, > +using either the Apple/NeXT or the GNU Objective-C runtime. The index entry "@cindex Objective-C" should not be here, but where the features specific to Objective-C are described: > +@node Objective-C > +@subsection Objective-C here. > +A fully qualified Objective-C method name is specified as > + > +@example > +-[Class methodName] > +@end example Please change this to the following: +@example +-[@var{Class} @var{methodName}] +@end example "Class" and "methodName" are meta-syntactic variables (they stand for something else), and you use them, correctly, inside @var{} in the text that explains this notation. So they should be in @var{} here as well. With these two changes, please commit the patch. Thanks!