From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: recurse.exp: watch on local variable that goes out of scope
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9787-Tue20Jul2004223539+0300-eliz@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FD2E1F.7070403@axis.com> (message from Orjan Friberg on Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:37:19 +0200)
> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:37:19 +0200
> From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
>
> Now for the confusing part: bpstat_stop_status is called with
> stopped_by_watchpoint == 1. This is because, at this point,
> i386_stopped_data_address returns the address of the local variable "b" (the
> address it had in recurse (a=5)), as if it were stopped due to a watchpoint hit.
> I would have expected i386_stopped_data_address to return 0 at this point,
> since it didn't stop due to a watchpoint hit. What am I missing here? Does
> i386_stopped_data_address retain the stopped data address from the previous hit?
No, it shouldn't return a stale address, it should return zero.
I reproduce the entire source of i386_stopped_data_address below; as
you see, it starts by zeroing out `addr' and assigns it a non-zero
value _only_ if I386_DR_WATCH_HIT(i) returns non-zero for some value
of i. This is supposed to query the debuggee about its debug
registers, and assumes that one of the debug registers will show that
a watchpoint has been hit only if a watchpoint has indeed been hit.
Can you step thru i386_stopped_data_address and see what exactly
happens there in your case?
CORE_ADDR
i386_stopped_data_address (void)
{
CORE_ADDR addr = 0;
int i;
dr_status_mirror = I386_DR_LOW_GET_STATUS ();
ALL_DEBUG_REGISTERS(i)
{
if (I386_DR_WATCH_HIT (i)
/* This second condition makes sure DRi is set up for a data
watchpoint, not a hardware breakpoint. The reason is
that GDB doesn't call the target_stopped_data_address
method except for data watchpoints. In other words, I'm
being paranoiac. */
&& I386_DR_GET_RW_LEN (i) != 0)
{
addr = dr_mirror[i];
if (maint_show_dr)
i386_show_dr ("watchpoint_hit", addr, -1, hw_write);
}
}
if (maint_show_dr && addr == 0)
i386_show_dr ("stopped_data_addr", 0, 0, hw_write);
return addr;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 14:37 Orjan Friberg
2004-07-20 19:37 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-07-22 9:44 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-07-22 19:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 9:23 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-07-28 15:52 ` Orjan Friberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9787-Tue20Jul2004223539+0300-eliz@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox