From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28740 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2004 17:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28723 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 17:59:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 17:59:55 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.159.46]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id EDW29037; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:58:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:59:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <9743-Wed11Aug2004205531+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: jjohnstn@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <411A5012.3000508@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:57:54 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41191D71.60204@redhat.com> <7494-Wed11Aug2004070352+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <411A4209.6020801@redhat.com> <411A5012.3000508@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:57:54 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Right. In addition to the breakpoints, the MI needs to know about these > identical events (so that it can notify the gui of an shlib unload). Not that I'm against this, but perhaps instead of implementing a core GDB feature based on the observers (which, as far as I understand, were invented for a different purpose), we should talk about two separate changes: one that adds the observer, and another that fixes the problem reported by Jeff.