From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14858 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 15:45:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14851 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 15:45:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 15:45:49 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.144.52]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id AWS57016; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:44:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:45:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <9743-Thu04Dec2003174358+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: cagney@gnu.org, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <1031204044404.ZM3660@localhost.localdomain> (message from Kevin Buettner on Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:44:04 -0700) Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3FC119EB.1060102@gnu.org> <3FC234C0.1000500@gnu.org> <20031124165047.GA2227@nevyn.them.org> <1031124182547.ZM9776@localhost.localdomain> <3FC26407.9000704@gnu.org> <1031125000932.ZM11256@localhost.localdomain> <3FC60A75.8090803@gnu.org> <1031204044404.ZM3660@localhost.localdomain> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:44:04 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > I have already stated that I think the renaming of deprecated > interfaces is okay in some instances. I am concerned, however, that > this approach is being used in instances where it doesn't really > need to be. Seconded. Can we conclude this thread by agreeing that renaming of deprecated interfaces should be discussed first in cases such as STREQ? I think everybody agreed on that at some point.