From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: dan@cgsoftware.com
Cc: jason-swarelist@molenda.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:09:00 -0000
Message-id: <9743-Sat15Sep2001190254+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <20010909074800.A8112@shell17.ba.best.com> <3B9D054A.4C3CC2B1@cygnus.com> <20010910113226.A23487@shell17.ba.best.com> <87zo82swwa.fsf@cgsoftware.com> <20010910130347.A5628@shell17.ba.best.com> <8766aq7nki.fsf@cgsoftware.com> <3BA219EF.3000300@cygnus.com> <9003-Fri14Sep2001190223+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010914091241.A28921@shell17.ba.best.com> <1659-Fri14Sep2001204927+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010915005255.A2369@shell17.ba.best.com> <2110-Sat15Sep2001133818+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87k7z0pkfv.fsf@cgsoftware.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00192.html

> From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 11:01:24 -0400
> 
> All i'm asking is that he *prove*, besides using the GDB testsuite
> (which isn't a good test here, since it's tests for languages more
> than just C are pretty lacking), that his change is correct.

I tend to agree.  If we aren't sure such cases don't exist, we might
be introducing a subtle bug.