From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19313 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2003 07:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19306 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 07:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 07:33:24 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-198-14.inter.net.il [80.230.198.14]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.3-GR) with ESMTP id CPR47441; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:33:11 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:33:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <9743-Fri08Aug2003102929+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F32C63E.4090401@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:35:58 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco, 6.0] (C) and other fixes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3F2E85C0.1020504@redhat.com> <20030804162140.GA28146@nevyn.them.org> <3F31D476.4050803@redhat.com> <3F32C63E.4090401@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:35:58 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > >> > >> I think, though, that there is a makeinfo bug here. It should have > >> reported an error due to references to missing sections. > > > > > > What references were pointing to the missing sections? > > If I add @bye to the end of agentexpr.texi "make info" runs cleanly and > the document looks ok (the @bye appears to be ignored). However, if the > @bye is put in gdb.texinfo just after the @include agentexpr.texi, or if > @bye is put at the start of agentexpr.texi, "make info" gets errors > about undefined references to "Copying", "Index" and "GNU Free ...". > > TeX, on the other hand `dies a death' in both cases (which is what I'd > expect makeinfo to do). I'm confused: where is the bug in makeinfo that you thought about? AFAIU, makeinfo behaves correctly: produces a valid Info document in the first case and complains about the second.