From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2078 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2006 03:38:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 2070 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2006 03:38:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from p12018-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (HELO mail.pizzafactory.jp) (222.147.75.18) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:38:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [192.168.0.2]) by mail.pizzafactory.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A060211ADAA; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:37:59 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: References: <735259CC-31B1-4B61-A586-AF0B642CA374@monami-software.com> <245F9D05-6921-4988-9422-C0444CD688E6@monami-software.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9727A4E7-3D2B-480F-97D6-48979DCC2669@monami-software.com> Cc: fischermi@t-online.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Masaki Muranaka Subject: Re: AW: [PATCH] source.s: Fix problem handling windows like path with MinGW Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:38:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 On 2006/06/19, at 12:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: fischermi@t-online.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> From: Masaki Muranaka >> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:26:58 +0900 >> >>> So I think we should simply hard-code that in Windows native ports. >> >> GCC3.4.x uses PATH_SEPARATOR and it seems that has >> no issue. What is the difference between GCC and GDB? > > I have no idea. I don't track GCC development. Someone else will > have to answer that. I agree the hard-code is also one of the choice to fix. So I have no objection to apply Faylor's patch. (Although, it's possible to be re-patched.) -- Masaki Muranaka Monami software