Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [6.1] TUI in doco?
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9681-Tue23Mar2004214811+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405F5AF0.5040108@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:24 -0500)

> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:24 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> The attached is hopefully getting there.

Thanks.  My comments below.

> I also noticed an inconsistency in its name.  "Terminal User
> Interface" is what HP use, it fixes that as well.

FWIW, the previous interpretation of TUI was better: it's a text-mode
UI; "terminal" doesn't necessarily imply "text-mode".  Oh well...

> +@pindex @code{gdbtui}

There's no need to use @code in @pindex entries, these entries are
automatically typeset in the same typeface as arguments of @code.

> +Activate the Terminal User Interface when starting.  The Terminal User

The first occurence of "Terminal User Interface" would look better in
@dfn.  Also, a @cindex entry for "Terminal User Interface" somewhere,
probably where you have an index entry for TUI, could be a good idea.

> +The TUI is enabled by invoking @value{GDBN} using either
> +@pindex gdbtui
> +@samp{gdbtui} or @samp{gdb -tui}.

This is the second time we have a @pindex entry about gdbtui; one of
them is redundant and should be removed, I think.

Otherwise, fine with me.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-23 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-16 22:54 Andrew Cagney
2004-03-17  5:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-19  0:09   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-22 21:30   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-23 19:51     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-03-25 16:26       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-25 20:30         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-25 20:40           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-26  9:44             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-26 16:23               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09 ` [6.1] TUI in doco? (compiler errors) Manoj Iyer
2004-03-16 23:21   ` Manoj Iyer
2004-03-25 22:40   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09 ` [6.1] TUI in doco? Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9681-Tue23Mar2004214811+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@elta.co.il \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox