From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [6.1] TUI in doco?
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9681-Tue23Mar2004214811+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405F5AF0.5040108@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:24 -0500)
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:24 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> The attached is hopefully getting there.
Thanks. My comments below.
> I also noticed an inconsistency in its name. "Terminal User
> Interface" is what HP use, it fixes that as well.
FWIW, the previous interpretation of TUI was better: it's a text-mode
UI; "terminal" doesn't necessarily imply "text-mode". Oh well...
> +@pindex @code{gdbtui}
There's no need to use @code in @pindex entries, these entries are
automatically typeset in the same typeface as arguments of @code.
> +Activate the Terminal User Interface when starting. The Terminal User
The first occurence of "Terminal User Interface" would look better in
@dfn. Also, a @cindex entry for "Terminal User Interface" somewhere,
probably where you have an index entry for TUI, could be a good idea.
> +The TUI is enabled by invoking @value{GDBN} using either
> +@pindex gdbtui
> +@samp{gdbtui} or @samp{gdb -tui}.
This is the second time we have a @pindex entry about gdbtui; one of
them is redundant and should be removed, I think.
Otherwise, fine with me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-23 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 22:54 Andrew Cagney
2004-03-17 5:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-22 21:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-23 19:51 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-03-25 16:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-25 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-25 20:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-26 9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-26 16:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` [6.1] TUI in doco? (compiler errors) Manoj Iyer
2004-03-16 23:21 ` Manoj Iyer
2004-03-25 22:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` [6.1] TUI in doco? Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9681-Tue23Mar2004214811+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox