From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6796 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2004 03:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6788 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2004 03:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2004 03:53:45 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.141.54]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DBR98313; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:53:41 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:53:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <9681-Sun13Jun2004065036+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, stcarrez@nerim.fr In-reply-to: <40CB5950.9060902@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:28:16 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc; rfa:m68hc11] Delete RETURN_VALUE_ON_STACK Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <40CB5950.9060902@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:28:16 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > This converts the m68hc11 to the return_value architecture method > allowing us to delete RETURN_VALUE_ON_STACK. The documentation patch is fine with me.