Hi all, Let me recap: The python bindings I wrote break GDB compilation for Python 2.6 and below. I wrote a patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-02/msg00712.html which I later revised to this: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00039.html The revised patch was OK'd to push by Yao: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00058.html under the premise that Jose or I confirm that it works with Python 2.6. Jose confirmed the first version: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-02/msg00715.html As the second version does not change the actual code, I guess that is fine, too. Joel seems to be fine with the general solution as well: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00072.html Do I need Eli's OK for the added line in the documentation? Otherwise, it'd like to go ahead and push this patch. Regards, Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: Yao Qi [mailto:qiyaoltc@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 11:33 AM > To: Wiederhake, Tim > Cc: Jose E. Marchesi ; gdb- > patches@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: MemoryView missing from Python 2.4 and 2.6 > > "Wiederhake, Tim" writes: > > > Thanks for the pointer. I've attached a revised version of the patch. > > Hi Tim, > Did you run py-record-btrace.xp with python 2.6? or probably Jose can help > to run it with python 2.6. > > If the test Tim added pass with both python 2.6 and python 3, your patch is > OK. > > -- > Yao (齐尧) Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau Registered Office: Munich Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928 &j!z޶~ib֫rnr