From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: infrun.c:restore_selected_frame???
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9637D4C6-475D-11D6-A9CC-000393540DDC@apple.com> (raw)
Hi, all...
I am totally confused by restore_selected_frame. Why is it calling
find_relative_frame, passing in the current frame and level? Remember,
level comes from a stored value of selected_frame_level.
selected_frame_level is set in select_frame, and is either an absolute
frame level, or -1 if the caller of select_frame was just selecting by
frame_info and doesn't care about the level (which is done in a number
of places). So it is NOT a relative level at all, certainly not
relative to whatever the current frame happens to be except by
accident...
Since you also have the frame address sitting around in the
restore_selected_frame_args, why not use it to find the frame instead?
The patch below works for me, and eliminates a bunch of errant kvetching
about "Unable to restore selected frame"...
Does this seem right?
Jim
Index: infrun.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -c -w -r1.56 infrun.c
*** infrun.c 2002/03/18 02:26:31 1.56
--- infrun.c 2002/04/03 23:42:52
***************
*** 4004,4024 ****
struct restore_selected_frame_args *fr =
(struct restore_selected_frame_args *) args;
struct frame_info *frame;
int level = fr->level;
! frame = find_relative_frame (get_current_frame (), &level);
/* If inf_status->selected_frame_address is NULL, there was no
previously selected frame. */
! if (frame == NULL ||
! /* FRAME_FP (frame) != fr->frame_address || */
! /* elz: deleted this check as a quick fix to the problem that
! for function called by hand gdb creates no internal frame
! structure and the real stack and gdb's idea of stack are
! different if nested calls by hands are made.
!
! mvs: this worries me. */
! level != 0)
{
warning ("Unable to restore previously selected frame.\n");
return 0;
--- 4004,4017 ----
struct restore_selected_frame_args *fr =
(struct restore_selected_frame_args *) args;
struct frame_info *frame;
+ CORE_ADDR frame_address = fr->frame_address;
int level = fr->level;
! frame = find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain (frame_address);
/* If inf_status->selected_frame_address is NULL, there was no
previously selected frame. */
! if (frame == NULL)
{
warning ("Unable to restore previously selected frame.\n");
return 0;
--
Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com
Developer Tools - gdb
Apple Computer
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-03 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-03 15:50 Jim Ingham [this message]
2002-04-08 16:26 ` infrun.c:restore_selected_frame??? Andrew Cagney
2002-04-09 13:18 ` infrun.c:restore_selected_frame??? Jim Ingham
2002-04-09 14:25 ` infrun.c:restore_selected_frame??? Andrew Cagney
2002-04-16 8:02 ` infrun.c:restore_selected_frame??? Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9637D4C6-475D-11D6-A9CC-000393540DDC@apple.com \
--to=jingham@apple.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox