Re: [PATCH][gdb/doc] Fix to manual for description of remote protocol

[Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>]

On 7/22/20 2:58 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 14:56, Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net <mailto:pedro@palves.net>> wrote:
> 
> Thanks very much for the review!
> 
>     Note this should go to the gdb/doc/ChangeLog file instead.
> 
> 
> Apologies, I didn't see that file existed.
> 
>     I see you're dropping the reference to the s (step) command.
>     However, either "s" or "vCont;s" _are_ mandatory if the target supports
>     hardware single-step.  E.g. an x86 stub that doesn't implement
>     s or vCont;s won't work.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the correction.
> 
>     The choice of whether to require s is a little more complicated
>     than that, but I don't think we need to go into too much detail here.
> 
>     Do you think the version below is clear enough?
> 
> 
> That looks great to me.

Alright, I've merged it.

Thanks!