From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2953851C0B for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 19:10:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8B2953851C0B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D8A21E792; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:10:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/42] Make queue_and_load_dwo_tu receive a dwarf2_cu To: Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Cc: Simon Marchi References: <20200512210913.5593-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <20200512211141.6073-16-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <87r1vb1ywv.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <94d03e94-01dd-8cc2-bc13-db4394f6e5b2@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:10:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r1vb1ywv.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 19:10:57 -0000 On 2020-05-22 4:45 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches writes: > > Simon> I kept this as a separate patch, because since there's no strong typing > Simon> here, it's easy to miss something. > > Good idea. > > This is another area where (1) a variant of the GCC hash table would be > nice, and (2) where I wish at least the libiberty hash table had > external iteration. (For (2), I know some code in GCC used to do this, > but that always seemed like a bit of an abstraction violation to me.) > > Tom > Agreed :). Simon