From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Julio Guerra <julio@farjump.io>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not clear the value of st_dev in File I/O's stat()
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9445cc6c-a954-7cdf-d0dc-47a18e596db3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010201636d368a34-7edcde92-3661-4c9a-94b4-a894b9c8e90a-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>
[Hi Corinna, adding you in case you still happen to remember
any of this and have any input. If not, that's fine.]
On 05/17/2018 09:28 AM, Julio Guerra wrote:
> Do not clear the value of st_dev in the fileio stat structure sent to the
> target. It prevents from being able to check the file type on the target.
> Note that the fileio function fstat `remote_fileio_func_fstat()` doesn't clear
> this field.
Curious. This looked like was written in a way like you'd write if you
had a reason to so I did some archaeology to try to find what it was, see
if the reason is still valid.
I found the original File I/O protocol proposal here:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2002-11/msg00107.html
and in there, in the intro, it said:
~~~~~
The protocol is only used for files on the host file system and
for I/O on the console. Character or block special devices, pipes,
named pipes or sockets or any other communication method on the host
system are not supported by this protocol.
~~~~~
and further below, in "B.3 struct stat", it says:
~~~~~
The values of several fields have a restricted meaning and/or
range of values.
st_dev: 0 file
1 console
~~~~~
And the current manual also says:
@item st_dev
A value of 0 represents a file, 1 the console.
And it looks like early on, in:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2003-03/msg00221.html
we had:
+static void
+remote_fileio_to_fio_stat (struct stat *st, struct fio_stat *fst)
+{
+ /* `st_dev' is set in the calling function */
+ remote_fileio_to_fio_uint ((long) st->st_ino, fst->fst_ino);
Note the comment.
I can't find the comment in the current sources, but it was there
up until:
commit 791c00567a7ccbae3d71e3b63ac43c0b555079dc
Author: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Mar 11 17:53:57 2015 +0000
Move remote_fileio_to_fio_stat to gdb/common
and note that remote_fileio_func_fstat still does:
if (fd == FIO_FD_CONSOLE_IN || fd == FIO_FD_CONSOLE_OUT)
{
host_to_fileio_uint (1, fst.fst_dev);
^^^
"fstat" was only added later on, along the work that Gary did
around that commit above, for this series:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00286.html
... which introduced "fstat" in the protocol, and in that case,
the 0/1 st_dev issue was either missed or ignored, so
fstat is not following the documented values.
Now I'm not sure what to do. If we let the real st_dev
through, what shall we fill it in, in the "console" files
case?
>
> 2018-05-16 Julio Guerra <julio@farjump.io>
>
> * remote-fileio.c: do not clear the value of st_dev in File I/O's stat().
Nit, you'd write:
gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-05-16 Julio Guerra <julio@farjump.io>
* remote-fileio.c (remote_fileio_func_stat): Do not clear the
value of st_dev.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180517082631.26855-1-julio@farjump.io>
2018-05-17 10:32 ` Julio Guerra
2018-05-17 15:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
[not found] ` <496efebf-0f96-4586-de39-0a1857994f04@farjump.io>
2018-05-18 18:29 ` Julio Guerra
2018-05-28 10:50 ` Corinna Vinschen
[not found] ` <6f5980ae-247c-1991-ba3c-884fe04a94c5@farjump.io>
2018-05-28 12:49 ` Julio Guerra
2018-05-28 13:18 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9445cc6c-a954-7cdf-d0dc-47a18e596db3@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=julio@farjump.io \
--cc=vinschen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox