Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Bunt <Richard.Bunt@arm.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Dirk Schubert <Dirk.Schubert@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH] Enable hardware watchpoints on attach for aarch64
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <942ba9f74d67b3857396d461353aae1a@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BDFF5B49-0B39-475D-A7BD-2B330513866A@arm.com>

On 2018-06-07 09:19, Alan Hayward wrote:
> Aarch64 changes look good to me.
> I’m not up to speed enough with .exp files to comment on that part.
> I tested it on an aarch64 box, and it works fine for me.

Hi,

I looked at the test, if Alan is fine with the code changes then I am 
fine with them.  I noted some nits, but otherwise it looks good.  Please 
push after addressing them.

>>> +# Get the PID of the test process.
>>> +set testpid ""
>>> +set test "get inferior process ID"
>>> +    gdb_test_multiple "p mypid" $test {
>>> +    -re " = ($decimal)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
>>> +    set testpid $expect_out(1,string)
>>> +    pass $test
>>> +    }
>>> +}

You can use get_integer_valueof for this.

>>> +set test "attach $testpid"
>>> +gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
>>> +    -re "Attaching to program.*process $testpid\r\n.*$gdb_prompt $" 
>>> {
>>> +    pass "$test"
>>> +    }
>>> +    timeout {
>>> +    fail "$test"
>>> +    }
>>> +}

Just wondering, can't simple gdb_test be used here?

>>> +
>>> +gdb_test_no_output "set should_continue = 1"
>>> +# Ensure the test program is in the top frame so the required
>>> +# variables are in scope.
>>> +gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "prewatchtrigger"]
>>> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "prewatchtrigger"
>>> +
>>> +gdb_test "watch watched_variable" \
>>> +     "Hardware watchpoint $decimal: watched_variable"
>>> +
>>> +gdb_test "continue" \
>>> +     "continue.*Continuing.*\.Hardware watchpoint $decimal:\
>>> +         watched_variable.*Old value = 0.*New value = 4.*"

8 spaces -> tab on the last line.  Though for test patterns, it's fine 
to go over 80 columns, IMO.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-12  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23 10:32 Richard Bunt
2018-06-07  8:54 ` [PING] " Richard Bunt
2018-06-07 13:19   ` Alan Hayward
2018-06-12  1:38     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-06-18 14:41       ` Richard Bunt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=942ba9f74d67b3857396d461353aae1a@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=Dirk.Schubert@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Bunt@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox