From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84784 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2017 02:05:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 84299 invoked by uid 89); 28 Dec 2017 02:05:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=d=c3=a9c, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit?= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 02:05:46 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-251-162.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.251.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D9151E02D; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 21:05:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: hurd: PIE support To: bug-hurd@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, thomas@codesourcery.com References: <20171222165554.l7rvub52zs2p5bvt@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <47cd545e-6931-cacf-5517-189f4dcaaea9@simark.ca> <20171227154435.rjlz4w73t7lbsucy@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <9427bbb8-edc2-d493-c4df-61f15d637f55@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 02:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171227154435.rjlz4w73t7lbsucy@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On 2017-12-27 10:44 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Simon Marchi, on mar. 26 déc. 2017 21:48:23 -0500, wrote: >> We would also need a ChangeLog entry. > > Well, I had put a ChangeLog entry at the top of the posted file. Is > something else needed? In the patch I have just sent to the list I have > directly put the gdb/ChangeLog update in addition to the commit message > log. If that is what is wanted, then the gdb/CONTRIBUTE file should be > update, otherwise frustration happens on both sides. > > Samuel > Ah, sorry I missed it. I ended up using git-apply to apply the patch (git-am wouldn't work), which looses the information before the diff. I'll reply to the other mail. Simon