From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106823 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2018 11:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 106813 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2018 11:37:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:37:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F84E4040073; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA6D111DCF4; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Breakage on builder RHEL-s390x-m64, revision c2bf1eecf99abc4d546bb52a008a25e64a29d85e To: Alan Modra , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180416112251.GU3684@bubble.grove.modra.org> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <92ad1dab-f91f-a2ee-15c4-e26486a81c70@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180416112251.GU3684@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 On 04/16/2018 12:22 PM, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:58:22AM -0400, gdb-buildbot@sergiodj.net wrote: >> Unfortunately it seems that there is a breakage on GDB. >> >> Commit title: 'Remove m88k support' >> Revision: c2bf1eecf99abc4d546bb52a008a25e64a29d85e > [snip] >> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/m88k-tdep.c: In function void _initialize_m88k_tdep(): >> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/m88k-tdep.c:867:21: error: bfd_arch_m88k was not declared in this scope >> gdbarch_register (bfd_arch_m88k, m88k_gdbarch_init, NULL); > > Yes, removing the bfd support for m88k will do that.. > > m88k has been obsolete since 2016-09-27, ie. it was obsolete in > binutils-2.28 and should have been removed for binutils-2.29. > No point in keeping the GDB support then. We have an OpenBSD/m88k host/native port, but I don't expect that anyone will be using that as cross development host, so I think we should just remove it. > sparc-aout and sparc-coff, m68k-aout and m68k-coff, sh5 and sh64, > sh-symbianelf, vax-bsd and vax-ultrix, w65, we32k, m88k, h8500, > h8300-coff, ieee695, tandem, newsos3, netware, and tahoe all > went today. > > i860, i960, bout, adobe and icoff targets disappeared last week. > GDB also dropped support for a few of the above in the past years, including completely dropping support for a.out targets. Looks like it's gdb spring cleaning time too then. Thanks, Pedro Alves