Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Add back gdb_pretty_print_insn

[Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>]

On 2017-02-01 18:50, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 08:31 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> reuse both.  Which suggests creating a new struct to hold
>> whatever should survive across calls.  And then we can
>> go the step further, and make that a class, with
>> pretty_print_insn a method of _that_ class instead of
>> of gdb_disassembler.  Like:
>> 
>> I can try that, but I think I'd rather do it after
>> string_file is in already.
> 
> Here's what it looks like, on top of the v4 series.

I think it looks good, it doesn't really add any complexity.

> diff --git a/gdb/disasm.h b/gdb/disasm.h
> index dffe9cd..a03eba6 100644
> --- a/gdb/disasm.h
> +++ b/gdb/disasm.h
> @@ -97,11 +97,34 @@ extern void gdb_disassembly (struct gdbarch
> *gdbarch, struct ui_out *uiout,
>  extern int gdb_print_insn (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR memaddr,
>  			   struct ui_file *stream, int *branch_delay_insns);
> 
> -/* Prints the instruction INSN into UIOUT and returns the length of
> -   the printed instruction in bytes.  */
> +/* Class used to pretty-print an instruction.  */

I'd say "...to pretty-print instructions.", since the goal is to reuse 
it for multiple instructions.