Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Look for separate debug files in debug directories under a sysroot.
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91c7cefc-e186-a82d-d0cf-02975a0306a9@FreeBSD.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96b4fb01-d703-ad1b-5ea5-d7e5366f5f6b@polymtl.ca>

On 1/26/19 9:12 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-01-26 12:16 a.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
>> As discussed on IRC, we should probably add the same behavior for 
>> build-id-based separate debug files.
> 
> I gave a shot to this, here's what I have:
> 
> From 377ef615ad6e2c57966c8853c61cbce95ea6c2b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:34:45 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Look for build-id-based separate debug files under the
>  sysroot
> 
> When looking for a separate debug file that matches a given build-id,
> GDB only looks in the host's debug dir (typically /usr/lib/debug).  This
> patch makes it look in the sysroot as well.  This is to match the
> behavior of GDB when using debuglink-based separate debug files.
> 
> In the following example, my sysroot is "/tmp/sysroot" and I am trying
> to load symbols for
> /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so.  This is
> the current behavior:
> 
>     (gdb) file /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so
>     Reading symbols from /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so...
> 
>     Looking for separate debug info (build-id) for /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so
>       Trying /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f3/d6594d2600e985812cd4ba2ad083ac2aceae22.debug... no, unable to compute real path
> 
>     <snip>
>     (No debugging symbols found in /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so)
> 
> With this patch:
> 
>     (gdb) file /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so
>     Reading symbols from /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so...
> 
>     Looking for separate debug info (build-id) for /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gconv/EBCDIC-AT-DE.so
>       Trying /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f3/d6594d2600e985812cd4ba2ad083ac2aceae22.debug... no, unable to compute real path
>       Trying /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f3/d6594d2600e985812cd4ba2ad083ac2aceae22.debug... yes!
>     Reading symbols from /tmp/sysroot/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f3/d6594d2600e985812cd4ba2ad083ac2aceae22.debug...
> 
> In the original code, there is a suspicious "abfd.release ()" in
> build_id_to_debug_bfd, that I don't understand.  If a file with the
> right name exists but its build-id note doesn't match, we release (leak)
> our reference, meaning the file will stay open?  I removed it in the new
> code, so that the reference is dropped if we end up not using that file.
> I tested briefly by corrupting a separate debug file to trigger this
> code, nothing exploded.

I think this looks good to me.  I think the .release () should have been
abfd.reset (nullptr) instead as you noted.  I think this isn't the first
time we've seen release () used when reset (nullptr) should have been used
instead unfortunately.  The name of that method is a bit ambiguous
unfortunately.  Do you want me to pull this into my series or just push it
after I push the final version of mine?

-- 
John Baldwin

                                                                            


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-28 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-23  1:04 [PATCH 0/2] Some fixes for debug files and sysroots John Baldwin
2019-01-23  1:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] Trim trailing directory separators from new sysroots John Baldwin
2019-01-26 19:10   ` Simon Marchi
2019-01-28 20:41     ` John Baldwin
2019-01-23  1:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Look for separate debug files in debug directories under a sysroot John Baldwin
2019-01-26  5:17   ` Simon Marchi
2019-01-26 17:12     ` Simon Marchi
2019-01-28 18:53       ` John Baldwin [this message]
2019-02-22 20:51         ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91c7cefc-e186-a82d-d0cf-02975a0306a9@FreeBSD.org \
    --to=jhb@freebsd.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox