Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] Don't change current program space in exec_target::close
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:22:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <911cbbda-6f10-8806-7637-3be8111bd250@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722033444.18522-7-tom@tromey.com>

On 2020-07-21 11:34 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote:
> Now that we've removed the macros and changed exec_close to be a
> method, it's clear that exec_target::close can operate on program
> spaces without changing the current program space.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2020-07-21  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
> 
> 	* exec.c (exec_target::close): Don't change current program
> 	space.
> ---
>  gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
>  gdb/exec.c    | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/exec.c b/gdb/exec.c
> index e2a0cae787c..b2c7a58b27f 100644
> --- a/gdb/exec.c
> +++ b/gdb/exec.c
> @@ -154,11 +154,8 @@ exec_target_open (const char *args, int from_tty)
>  void
>  exec_target::close ()
>  {
> -  scoped_restore_current_program_space restore_pspace;
> -
>    for (struct program_space *ss : program_spaces)
>      {
> -      set_current_program_space (ss);
>        clear_section_table (&ss->target_sections);
>        ss->exec_close ();
>      }

Ah, forget my comment on last patch.

So yeah, ss->exec_close calls remove_target_sections, which uses current_program_space.

I think that would need to be changed first, but there doesn't seem to be any blocker
for that.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-22  3:34 [PATCH 0/9] Remove some macros from exec.h and progspace.h Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] Remove exec_filename macro Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] Change exec_close to be a method on program_space Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] Remove commented-out code from gcore.c Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] Remove exec_bfd_mtime define Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] Remove current_target_sections macro Tom Tromey
2020-07-22 12:20   ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-22 12:39     ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-22 14:11       ` Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] Don't change current program space in exec_target::close Tom Tromey
2020-07-22 12:22   ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] Remove the exec_bfd macro Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] Change program_space::ebfd to a gdb_bfd_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2020-07-22  3:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] Remove symfile_objfile macro Tom Tromey
2020-07-22 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/9] Remove some macros from exec.h and progspace.h Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=911cbbda-6f10-8806-7637-3be8111bd250@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox