From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 1ZWhCWfAVmKNBwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:21:59 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1F4D71F327; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:21:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6EE1ED17 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160CE385803E for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:21:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 160CE385803E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1649852518; bh=e1ZOD+3GGs1uC20AH6Mb1vzahb1jhv29sHmWWk3GdNw=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=FYvBAbK+Ob4tiVMJx2I6Wp7vHaOyEx6o4LMAzvPO+kE86UAqMdCUDuPqprANTQSxx dfZjHfrw4K/5cq+JrPmtFMzs8J5S3+VOvRpp/Yjm3yj49/79LH6s2ylttx2Jf1CbS1 VpJO4MXixIgTG9UZx36foEuRywx8KCdAdDUzXEb0= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED533858C53 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:21:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1ED533858C53 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nec09-0002ym-RX; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:21:38 -0400 Received: from ip5f5a87b5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.135.181]:60677 helo=[192.168.111.41]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nec05-0003zu-Gj; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <9080f7df-c91b-eec1-a3fb-a582c59f5b34@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:21:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Add dump and load command to process record and replay Content-Language: en-US To: gdb-patches ml References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Sobisch via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Sobisch Cc: Michael Snyder Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Can anyone share information about the following points? * Was there any showstopper issue with the patch? * Would someone take up Hui's work on this? Simon Am 24.01.2022 um 10:26 schrieb Hui Zhu: > I am not sure. > I gave up the patches If you cannot find it in the upstream. > > Best, > Hui > > Simon Sobisch 于2022年1月21日周五 14:46写道： >> >> This RFC was about a way to store a command file along with recording >> and later be able to load it and reverse-step / step through it. >> That idea sounds very cool and like something that I would use quite >> often, especially on longer debugging runs where the starting point >> takes a while to reach... >> >> I've stumbled over this suggested patch which was discussed and adjusted >> multiple times in 2009 and then seem to be loose on a documentation >> question. >> >> The last entry I've found to this was >> https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00145.html >> >> Can anyone share about the state of this patch? >> Would anyone like to adjust this to the current source? >> >> Thanks for any insights, >> Simon >