From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27126 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2002 17:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26911 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 17:41:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 17:41:14 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-220-181.inter.net.il [213.8.220.181]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BFV60495; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:40:40 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:41:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: cgf@redhat.com Message-Id: <9003-Wed20Feb2002193856+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020220155740.GF26603@redhat.com> (message from Christopher Faylor on Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:57:40 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] document cygwin native specific commands Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4.2.0.58.20020220124517.024e25f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20020220155740.GF26603@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:57:40 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > > I don't see any reason to impose that extra level of keywords on a > user. Yes, I agree.