From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29328 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2004 18:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29222 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 18:25:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 18:25:28 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.119]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DBB43414; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:48:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:25:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Paul Hilfinger Message-Id: <9003-Wed09Jun2004204544+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040609092355.AA07EF2956@nile.gnat.com> (message from Paul Hilfinger on Wed, 9 Jun 2004 05:23:55 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040608090758.C59CAF2940@nile.gnat.com> <3405-Wed09Jun2004011206+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040609092355.AA07EF2956@nile.gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 > From: Paul Hilfinger > Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 05:23:55 -0400 (EDT) > > > > What else can B be in this context? > > A function name. I take it "function or file @var{B}" is too terse for you? No, I simply missed that, sorry. > > This should say "as of @value{GDBN} version X.YY". A year or two from > > now, someone will have hard time updating this verbiage given the > > changes in Ada support. > > OK, but I am not sure what editorial comment you are implying with the > word "verbiage" (:->). A bad way to say "wording"... ;-) > > > +The type of the @t{'Address} attribute may not be @t{System.Address}. > > > > I think you should use @code instead of @t in this and similar cases. > > Umph. The problem is that @code{'Address} generates `'Address' in Info files, > which looks odd. That's true, but isn't that a problem in all Ada-related documentation?