From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11408 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2004 18:40:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11376 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 18:40:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 18:40:51 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-198-72.inter.net.il [80.230.198.72]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BGR09148; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:40:16 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:40:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <9003-Wed04Feb2004204122+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040204164734.GB8281@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:47:34 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] inside_entry_func() related changes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1031122000931.ZM22440@localhost.localdomain> <20040204164734.GB8281@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:47:34 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Revisiting this patch too. I've added documentation and removed the > now-unneeded change to inside_entry_func; does anyone disagree with > this patch? Docs OK? The markup is okay. I have two comments about the content: . I'd like a "@cindex process entry point" index entry near this text. . After reading the text, I'm not sure what is the process entry point and how it differs from the main function (talk about class_obscure!). I'm guessing that other readers of the manual could also become confused. So how about explaining the term "process entry function" and perhaps an example that shows the effect of this setting on a backtrace? TIA