From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21084 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2004 17:15:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21074 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 17:15:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 17:15:52 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-199-136.inter.net.il [80.230.199.136]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DKY06480; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:15:15 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:15:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <9003-Sun27Jun2004201103+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <20040626121121.GC8039@cygbert.vinschen.de> (message from Corinna Vinschen on Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:11:21 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA] infcmd.c: Fix UI problem in attach_command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040626121121.GC8039@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:11:21 +0200 > From: Corinna Vinschen > > Before trying to load the executable's symbol table, attach_command > calls target_terminal_inferior(). Do you (or anyone else, like Elena) know why do we relinquish the terminal to the inferior while loading the symbol table? It sounds like a strange thing to do at this point.