From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24531 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2003 13:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24524 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2003 13:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2003 13:03:37 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.156.233]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id BSI96776; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:03:28 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:03:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Jim Blandy Message-Id: <9003-Sat25Oct2003145827+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 24 Oct 2003 22:59:39 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: fix node name (revised patch) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 24 Oct 2003 22:59:39 -0500 > > I was trying to figure out why this hasn't bothered anyone yet --- the > node name with the single quotes has been in there for months --- and > I realized that it is because I'm using an older version of > texinfo.tex (circa 1999). The real question that we should ask ourselves wrt this is: how come your older texinfo.tex was being used instead of the one that comes with GDB (which, I hope, is new enough). Can you look into this, please?