From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7271 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2002 11:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6834 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2002 11:04:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO diana.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.19) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2002 11:04:46 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (adsl-ayalon-pc-129-40.inter.net.il [213.8.129.40]) by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id AQX86333; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:04:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:04:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Corinna Vinschen Message-Id: <9003-Sat23Nov2002130436+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20021121102201.W24928@cygbert.vinschen.de> (message from Corinna Vinschen on Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:22:01 +0100) Subject: Re: [RFA]: File-I/O patch, Documentation Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20021121100443.U24928@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20021121102201.W24928@cygbert.vinschen.de> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00576.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:22:01 +0100 > From: Corinna Vinschen > > Subsitute > > > +The integral datatypes are conforming to the definition in B.1 so this > > +structure is of size 64 bytes. > > by > > The integral datatypes are conforming to the definitions given in the > approriate section (@xref{Integral datatypes}, for details) so this > structure is of size 64 bytes. That's okay, but please don't use "@xref" except at the beginning of a sentence, because it produces capitalized "Note:" and "See" in the output. In this case, I suggest instead to say approriate section (see @ref{Integral datatypes}, for details) so this