From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19654 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2004 11:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19647 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 11:34:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gollum.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2004 11:34:27 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-205-122.inter.net.il [80.230.205.122]) by gollum.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id CLG29735; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:34:23 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:34:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <9003-Sat14Feb2004133455+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <402D2DF2.8030001@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:05:06 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Zap mi1 reference Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <402D2DF2.8030001@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:05:06 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > This removes a reference to "mi1" in the documentation. It's no longer > tested (hence 'supported'). I don't think we should remove documentation of existing features, even if they are not reliably supported. How about adding some text about mi1 being deprecated and unsupported instead?